Paparazzi Wastes No Time Violating Harry Potter's Emma Watson
Emma Watson just turned 18 and she already learned a valuable lesson; if you are famous and go out on the town it is always good to wear panties. Next time just make sure they're not the see-through variety. I am very happy to welcome Watson to the vagina flashing club, she is barely legal and already joined the ranks of Lindsay Lohan, Britney Spears and Paris Hilton flashing her panties while out celebrating her birthday, I just don't know why it took so long for the pictures to hit the Internet.
While not quite a full on Va-J-J shot, this will do for starters. You can see her pubic hair, through her black underwear. Nice!
It makes one wonder how many accidental - under-age nip-slips and up-skirts the paparazzi have to get rid of because it is illegal to sell them.
In other Watson news she has just replaced Scarlett Johansson in a period drama about Napoleon. This will be her first leading role outside the Harry Potter franchise. Johansson left the movie when it was obvious that the role required a younger-actress. Isn't Johansson like 23-years-old? Move on over you are getting old, make room for Watson because she is ready to take over, and what a good way to start but with a little panty flashing!
User login
Latest image
LATEST COMMENTS
RECENT POPULAR
ALL-TIME POPULAR
Poll
LATEST USER POSTS
SPONSORED LINKS
-
Shop women's footwear @ Masseys. Pay later!
-
Everything for the backyard - Smith & Hawen
-
Shutterfly - Get 50 free prints and a free Collage Poster to get started. Plus, enjoy free photo share and unlimited photo storage!
- Fingerhut makes online home shopping easy and convenient. Brand Name Electronics , Bedding, Dinnerware and more.
I don't know Emma personally but she doesn't seem like the type of person that would freely lift up her dress so you could take a picture. I would say she is shocked to see someone got a picture like that. She should also in no way be compared to Lindsay, Paris, or Britney. Emma if you read this I hope you know by now that it doesn't really matter what other people think of you. The only thing that matter is what you think of yourself.
i doubt she "posed" for the crotch shots either.. but then.. why wear see-through panties unless you want them to be seen through?
Why would they invade her privacy to begin with? Why does the news get candid shots when they have no business? Can't we let them live semi-normal lives too? Let them keep there inner-personal lives!
No, they can't lead normal lives. Why? Because the country is filled with celebrity obsessed losers like yourself who sit around on their asses reading stupid celeb blogs like this one.
The same goes for you.. :)
"Because the country is filled with celebrity-obsessed-people haters like yourself who sit around on their asses writing in stupid celeb blogs like this one." Enjoy. :)
P.S: Also one more thing.. How come you reading this? You must have searched "Emma Watson paparazzi" or something similar, because I searched just "Emma Watson"
and it returned NOTHING about paparazzis.. So ask yourself what are YOU doing here
before insulting people that you dont know.. Because if ONLY losers visit this, then the creators
must be losers too for creating a site where ONLY losers visit..
And I really DONT believe that they are.. :)
Poor thing, she was only out for a bit of fun at her 18th and some pervert paparazzo snaps a pic up her dress! Disgusting. She and other female actresses shouldn't have to worry about their privacy being violated like that. That is sexual harrassment and seriously desperate behaviour.
Gimme a break. She's got PR agents to teach her how to behave, on of her charming attributes is being less preened and 'perfect' (ie fake) than all the rest.
Not to get pop-psychology on you, but the fact that she wore seethru knickers at the very least demonstrates that she wants to be acknowledged as a sexual (sexy) adult, if only to herself, or whoever she's dating (even though she's been street legal for 2 years).
She knows what she's doing, I wouldn't spare her any tears.
Has it not occured to you that the see-through knickers might havebeen for the benefit of her bf rather than the rest of the world?
Don't a lot of light black fabrics go sheer under flash?
It is appalling for paparazzi to deleberately attempt to take photos up a woman's skirt - much less a girl who is just barely eighteen.
stfu you losers. this is old news, paparazzi's been doing this for years, don't catch feelings because its happened to a character in one of your favorite stories give me a break. i doubt you were crying fowl when it happened to these other girls mentioned. grow up. people grow up and want to fuck.
Hah! This guy's hilarious, "people grow up and want to fuck".
RESPECT EMMA!!!
As much as I'd love to rant and rave all day about how this act of the paparazzi is absolutely O.U.T.R.A.G.E.O.U.S I have to agree with an earlier comment that the media has been doing this since day 1.
I'm a big fan of Emma and this whole thing about the media getting shots of her underwear and violating her modesty really upsets me, but I can't help but say that all celebrities are victims of the paparazzi and no matter how much we voice our displeasure, this lunacy will never end.
RESPECT EMMA!
I only think that Emmas dress just slipt away when she jumpt in the to the car or somthing and then a photographer came too close and thought she was flashing them, before she could lay her dress over her panties . She had a short dress they say so maybe i have right.
Everyone knows that papparazzi prey on hot young actresses. Therefore, if one happens to be a hot young actress, common sense would dictate that one dress in a manner not easily vulnerable to "wardrobe malfunctions." That is, unless, one's hidden purpose is to use an over agressive photographer as a coming out party. If there is no recurrence of this incident, I will chalk it up to the naivete and carelessness of a young woman who failed to remember that, though it's perfectly natural to celebrate one's sexuality at age 18, if you happen to be in the public eye, you must use extra discretion and be wary at all times of exploitation and voyuerism. Regretable, that's the price one must pay for being young, attractive and famous in the 21st century.
hey! i think that people should at least spare Emma some privacy! I mean it's hard enough to live a normal-ish life! I am a really big fan of Emma and i really feel strongly that she would not intend to flash her knickers! i mean come on! Nobody (ESPECIALLY EMMA!!!) would wantr a picture of their v***** posted on a world know website! Fore goodness sake! GIVE EMMA A LITTLE RESPECT!!!! XD =P
RE: "Has it not occured to you that the see-through knickers might havebeen for the benefit of her bf rather than the rest of the world?"
Of course - hence this sentence in my post:
"the fact that she wore seethru knickers at the very least demonstrates that she wants to be acknowledged as a sexual (sexy) adult, if only to herself, or //whoever she's dating//"
The very fact that she's got that attitude about herself makes her fair game to the paps - not only the fact that she's turned 18 (has been legal in the UK press for 2 years anyway).
--
RE: "Don't a lot of light black fabrics go sheer under flash?"
Yes, but these particular undies are from Elle MacPherson, my girlfriend has a bunch of them, and I can vouch for them being pretty seethru at all times :)
I just wish I could stick my wand in her Chamber of Secrets and Gobble on her Fire. ENGORGIO!!!!!
It's not the see-through underneath the skirt or the hair naught bit...but the mysterious white stain on her inner thigh that got my attention. gross
Sad very sad! I MEAN DAMN PEOPLE! I bet you ladies put on see though panties and never think a crotchagrapgh will be posted of you the next day all over the web. She made a mistake by the way she was sitting. But I am sure if you had a million camera snapping all over the place you would have trouble moving around as well. I completely agree GIVE HER SOME RESPECT. It is not like she was sh*t a** drunk hanging out of the car with her leg wide open and no panties at all.
No one gets upset when the same thing happens to Paris, Lindsay, Britney or other young stars. Why should this be such an outrage? Emma has spent years in the spotlight and while she has stayed out of rehab (so far) she has obviously had enough experience to know she should be careful around paparazzi. I don't think people can start calling paparazzi perverts and guilty of sexual harassment just because this happened to their favorite star and not someone they love to bitch about.
I think she should do bukkake
Bukkake !!!!!!!!!
From what I have heard about Emma Watson, she has been an attentiion seeker all her life. This is like her third upskirt shot already and she has decided to show some bush. I am sure her name has jump way up on internet searches by pervs like you all, and me, it's plain to assume she has planned all this so she can go up the ranks of celeberdom. Invading her privacy, I don't think so, if you want to be famous this is the price you pay. If these celebs hate it so much, I will gladly trade my job at Mcdonald's for theirs. I didn't think so! Most of these celebs are all hoebags anyways, look at Britneys slut sister. Emma has probably done it in the butt by now already so I am sure she doesn't care all that much about showing bush. Hoebagg attention grabber that she is..
Its not her fault. it ws an accident.She was just getting out of her car. But the paparazzi was gaining on her. so they got to see a glimpse and she is so not like Paris, Britney and Lohan. Think about it the 3 of them really wanted to do they really did reveal theirselves. And Emma is not a drunk. Im not close to her but Im sure she did not want this to happen or any other pantie slips. shes not that kind of person.Im not saying this just to protect her. So just leave her alone.
Post new comment