Star Trek: The Bold Genesis Of Mythology
[Editor's Note: This summer we will be featuring two reviews for some of the movies. Here is the second for Star Trek]
“I don't believe in the no-win scenario.”
-- Admiral James T. Kirk from Star Trek II: The Wrath Of Khan
“You're a great one for logic. I'm a great one for rushing in where angels fear to tread. We are both extremists. Reality has brought us somewhere in-between.”
-- Captain James T. Kirk from Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country
“You've always had a hard time finding your place in this world, haven't you? Never knowing your true worth. You can settle for less in ordinary life, or do you feel like you were meant for something better? Something special.”
-- Captain Christopher Pike from Star Trek (2009)

The explosive birth of James T. Kirk during the film’s cataclysmic opening ushers in the J.J. Abrams bold vision of Star Trek’s origins.. It is a birth that is very appropriate for the iconic Kirk. His father, George Kirk (Chris Hemsworth), has taken command of the USS Kelvin, after the ship’s captain has been killed onboard a Romulan vessel, by Nero (Eric Bana). The ship is under siege by the Romulan ship. It is a chaotic, wonderfully staged set piece as ship debris and explosions fill out the galactic canvas. During all of this madness, Winona Kirk (Jennifer Morrison) is in labor and is being evacuated from the doomed vessel. Her husband communicates with her from the bridge. The older Kirk is not going to survive, but he is going to make sure his wife and soon to be born son will survive. As luck would have it, James T. Kirk is born as all this is going on. His father lives long enough to name him. His father was captain for twelve minutes, but he managed to save 800 lives. His heroism becomes part of Starfleet lore. It is a wonderful moment in a film filled with many wonderful moments. The film is respectful to the source material, but never reverential. Young Kirk’s entrance is fitting. He is born during incredible circumstances. His birth reminds me of King Arthur’s birth in Excalibur, Benjamin Button’s birth in The Curious Case Of Benjamin Button and Tarzan’s birth in Greystoke: The Legend Of Tarzan Of The Apes. James Tiberius Kirk was born in the darkness of space-- it is where he was always meant to be.
J. J. Abrams understands what is at stake here. He has been brought in to resuscitate a dying franchise. The results are not merely great; they are outstanding. The newest Star Trek film is not a prequel or a remake, but a reboot. The reboot has become popular in this decade. The reboot has done wonders for the James Bond films which have starred Daniel Craig and the Batman films directed by Christopher Nolan. The reboot is becoming the common cure to revive dying franchises-- to make them fresh again for a new generation of filmgoers. There is a certain level of nostalgia involved for older audiences. Nostalgia can often be a bitter bitch that has no desire to make amends for the sick and tired clichés of stale storytelling. (The one reboot that remains in limbo is Rob Zombie’s Halloween. While I liked Rob Zombie’s approach to John Carpenter’s original film, it was met with a lot of resistance by the original film’s loyal following.) There is nothing to be upset with or resist with J.J. Abrams’ bold take on the legendary television and film series created by Gene Roddenberry. The newest film is not just for Trekkies, but for everyone. It is Abrams’ stroke of genius to have taken one of the most insular franchises and made it universal for everyone without having to dumb it down. Robert Orci and Alex Kurtzman’s screenplay is not afraid to break new ground and take chances. The film is richer for the bold chances it takes. In fact, the film’s major plot twist that involves time travel makes the reboot work better than anyone could have ever thought in the first place. It is fitting that J.J. Abrams is the director of the film. He understands the power of the television medium just as well David Simon, David Chase and Ron Moore. His shows such as Alias, Fringe and especially Lost, have made network television desirable again. His Mission: Impossible III may be the most memorable of the series because he understood it was based on a television show. The film had a flashback structure which is one of the primary storytelling devices he has used on Lost. With Star Trek, he introduces a time travel device that works very well into the film’s narrative. Actually, his brilliant work on Star Trek, has made me appreciate what he attempting to do on the current season of Lost with the time travel element. Abrams is respectful enough to the Star Trek canon, especially when it comes to the original films. He uses what worked very well in those films and jettisons everything else that bogged down those films, especially the ones that focused on Star Trek: The Next Generation. The film’s action pieces are incredible in their chaotic elegance. While the special effects are spectacular, they never drown out the human element of the film-- the visual effects are impressive. Speaking of being respectful, but not reverential, Michael Giacchino’s musical score echoes the works of Alexander Courage, Jerry Goldsmith and James Horner while breaking new ground as well. The film pays homage to Star Trek II: The Wrath Of Khan in several ways-- the best film of the original series. Nero, a Romulan, has a vendetta against Starfleet and specifically a certain Vulcan. Nero is very reminiscent of Ricardo Montalban’s Khan. Eric Bana who was so good in Munich and Chopper, is unrecognizable in the role-- kind of like Bernie Casey in Gargoyles. His facial tattoos make him like a cross between Darth Maul and Mike Tyson.
The Star Trek film also addresses another reason why the reboots are so popular, and especially with boomers. This film goes back to where it all began. Everyone is young again. Mythology has been reborn to not only suit the needs of greedy and desperate studio executives to sell many DVD and Blu-Ray box sets, but also to recapture the youth of the Boomer Generation and maybe Generation X as well. I get it. Who does not want to be young again? And with Star Trek, the opportunity to go back and be young again is done in the best possible way. The audience witnesses the major events in the lives of the young James Kirk and the young Spock. When we see the young Kirk (Jimmy Bennett) several years after his birth, he is a rebellious ruffian racing a stolen classic Corvette in 23rd Century Iowa. He drives the car over a cliff, but not before he is able to get out. It is the first sign of his daring escapades that provide a stunning foreshadowing to the older Kirk we know so well as played by William Shatner. On the planet Vulcan, the young Spock (Jacob Kogan) has his own ordeals to go through. He is half human and half Vulcan. He father Sarek (Ben Cross) married a human woman, Amanda Grayson (Winona Ryder). Spock is incredibly bright, but is bullied by his classmates because of his parentage. Years later, we catch up Kirk, wonderfully played by Chris Pine as he starts trouble in a local bar. He can handle himself well against a whole host of Starfleet Federation Cadets. After this major brawl, Kirk is introduced to Captain Christopher Pike, a Starship Captain, who had served on the same ship as his father. He was on the ship and witnessed his father’s bravery and heroics. Pike offers him the chance to be better than himself, to join Starfleet. It is the grandest offer he can make to the young troublemaker. He is Kirk’s surrogate father in this film. Greenwood’s performance is wonderfully paternalistic and downright charismatic. Kirk decides to enlist in Starfleet. Meanwhile the young Spock, played by Zachary Quinto (Heroes), decides to defy tradition on his native Vulcan and enlist in Starfleet as well. These two young men and their opposite extremes will collide as they encounter each other at Starfleet Academy which is still located in San Francisco. It is essential for these opposites to work well off one another and they do. Each performance is done in a loving way, but let me be very honest and say that the actors playing the young members of the USS Enterprise are not caricatures at all. J.J. Abrams Star Trek is not Muppet Babies-- far from it. Each performance is one of loving homage, but also vital originality. Chris Pine’s Kirk has the manic flare and daring bravery of Shatner’s Kirk, but none of the over the top acting that came with that package. It is an absolute joy to actually witness Pine’s Kirk take the famous Kobayashi Maru simulation test. It is incredible to see this piece of Star Trek mythology brought to life. Spock is the one who designed the test. Kirk’s solution to the situation is every bit as inventive as we ever imagined since Star Trek II: The Wrath Of The Khan. At the core of this film is the relationship between Kirk and Spock which evolves from animosity to respect and their great friendship. . Not only does it work, but it works better than one could ever hope. They do not meet until they are adults at Starfleet Academy. It is a rocky start as they begin to get to know each other. Quinto is able to convey by his facial expressions, the deep struggle between his human and Vulcan sides. Pine has a much more difficult task-- how to channel Kirk, but without all of William Shatner’s overkill. It is to Pine’s credit that he succeeds and elevates the role to something more than amateur theatrics. Leonard Nimoy has an extended cameo as the older Spock. It is to Leonard Nimoy’s credit that his cameo serves as the heart of the film. It is the essential bridge between the old and new. His presence in the film connects the entire series. His performance is essential for the film-- it makes Spock, not only the centerpiece of the film, but also the centerpiece of Nimoy’s life. There is an enormous sense of pride which accompanies his lifelong performance as Mr. Spock. This connection to the original television series and films is in many ways similar to the time when Obi-Wan Kenobi takes Anakin Skywalker’s lightsaber from him after their duel in Star Wars: Episode III: Revenge Of The Sith. This is the lightsaber that Obi-Wan gave to Luke Skywalker in A New Hope. Anakin’s lightsaber is the bridge that connects the inferior Prequel Trilogy to the superior Classic Trilogy of films.
The evolving relationship between Kirk and Spock must work for the film to be successful on any level. It is a joy to watch these iconic and mythic figures interact with each other for the first time. It is also incredible and pleasing to watch Kirk’s various and unsuccessful flirtations with Nyota Uhura as played by Zoe Saldana. First of all, Uhura has more to do in this film than Nichelle Nichols had to do in the entire original series and all the original films combined. Saldana’s Uhura sees right through Kirk’s flirtations. She wants nothing to do with him romantically despite all his advances. It is a refreshing change of pace not to see Kirk get his way all the time. This Uhura is more interested in Quinto’s Spock, which provides an interesting dynamic. I look forward to seeing how this dynamic is played out in future installments. Simon Pegg is nothing short of perfect as Engineer Montgomery “Scotty” Scott. Everything we love about Pegg from Shaun Of The Dead, Hot Fuzz and Run, Fatboy, Run is on full display here, but he never overdoes it. James Doohan would be very proud. John Cho of the Harold And Kumar films is perfect as Lt. Hikaru Sulu. He proves himself in an incredible action sequence involving skydiving and fighting various Romulan thugs on Vulcan. Charlie Bartlett’s Anton Yelchin is Pavel Chekov and I did not mind his Russian accent at all. There is something sweet and iconic in his mannerisms. Yet, the biggest credit has to go to Karl Urban for his intense and moving portrayal as Dr. Leonard “Bones” McCoy. Even before we physically see Urban’s Dr. McCoy, we can hear him. We know it is Bones. His first encounters with Pine’s Kirk are funny and heartfelt. They have an instant chemistry which is almost as important as the Kirk/Spock relationship. Once we see the two of them interact with each other, we totally believe the following interchange in Star Trek III: The Search For Spock as the USS Enterprise’s wreckage burns up along the Genesis Planet’s horizon:
Kirk: “My God, Bones... what have I done?”
McCoy: “What you had to do. What you always do: turn death into a fighting chance to live.”
It is his blossoming friendship with Dr. McCoy that sets the events in motion in this film. It is pleasure to watch this relationship unfold as well as Kirk’s relationship with Spock. Urban’s McCoy is the perfect compliment to DeForest Kelley. Abrams’ film truly shines when we get to see all of these iconic characters interact with each other on the bridge of the Enterprise. The greatest praise one can give this cast of young actors is that they are as good as the originals-- if not even better. The respect to the originals is inspiring.
While waiting to get into my screening of the film on Thursday night, I noticed something unique. As the previous audience was getting out from the 7:00 PM screening, everyone was smiling. These were people from all walks of life. Everyone was happy from their viewing experience. I have not seen this kind of reaction for several years. Last year’s Iron Man is a good example of a great movie going experience where everyone had a great time watching the film, but this was different. J.J. Abrams was able to not only make a film for the fanbase, but he made a film for everyone. It is a lesson that Zach Snyder could have used while making his epic, Watchmen. I enjoyed his reverential treatment of Alan Moore’s classic graphic novel, but it was made for only a limited part of the population. It is too loyal to the source material. No doubt it turned off some audience members. Luckily, J.J. Abrams decided it was wise to make a film for everyone. His methods are not unlike the utopian ideals that Gene Roddenberry based his series on in the first place. Star Trek was and has always been about hope. Hope is what the world needs right now. This film provides hope and promise for the future. It is a film that has resonated with audiences so far. One cannot help but feel elated as the film’s credit’s roll up at the end-- a wonderful rush of euphoria. It is as though that J.J. Abrams realizes when it comes to movies, the needs of many truly outweigh the needs of the few. Star Trek is just not a great Star Trek film, but it is an incredible film on its own merits. This is epic storytelling at its grandest and most exciting. Star Trek is the perfect film for our interesting times.
User login
LATEST COMMENTS
RECENT POPULAR
ALL-TIME POPULAR
SPONSORED LINKS
-
Shop women's footwear @ Masseys. Pay later!
-
Everything for the backyard - Smith & Hawen
-
Shutterfly - Get 50 free prints and a free Collage Poster to get started. Plus, enjoy free photo share and unlimited photo storage!
- Fingerhut makes online home shopping easy and convenient. Brand Name Electronics , Bedding, Dinnerware and more.














RE :
Star Trek: The Bold Genesis Of Mythology
By Jerry Dennis - Posted on May 10th, 2009
Tagged: Movies Review Star Trek
----------------------------------------------
TO:
Mr. David Plouffe
Campaign Manager
Obama for America
Dear Sir:
While congratulating you about your inspiring "THE AUDACITY TO WIN" 's story, allow me to submit to you an extract from a book concerning a scientific taboo - the energy of "BLACK HOLE" and THE DARK MATTER" in the Universe - in the Space and "abroad" - a Book that I intend to publish in the next future.
May "BILL A RI AND THERE WAS LIGTH" be in your hands a resounding victory for the energy of the "BLACK HOLE" and the "DARK MATTER", triumphantly steering the human ship toward the 21st century.
Lucien BONNET
http://www.contact-canadahati.ca
A NASA spacecraft designed by Dulles-based Orbital Sciences last week began a 3 billion-mile journey through the solar system toward an eventual rendezvous with two asteroids. See the company's statement.
--------------
IN THE DEPTH OF THE UNKNOWN,
THERE ARE NECESSARY CONQUESTS
The well-known NASA scientist and author of popular scientific works, Professor Carl Sagan, together with his wife Linda, among other people, wrote the famous Space Message engraved on Pioneer 10 and meant for possible extraterrestrial civilizations which might be discovered -- who knows? -- somewhere in our Galaxy. Professor Sagan is a master of the art of using humor, and he is fond of allegories. That is why Lucien Bonnet wrote to him in the form of a parable on April 10, 1978.
Montreal, April 10, 1978
Dear Dr. Sagan:
It sometimes happens that a dreambecomes a reality. That's the case today. Through Mr. Emil P. Ericksen, Economic Officer of the Consulate General of the United States of America in Montreal, I amin communication with the American scientist whose works and research I most admire.
I would like to address a simple message to Professor Carl Sagan and his wife, who feel, as the year 2000 approaches, that the time is ripe to make our presence known by sending signals to other possible intelligent beings in the Universe. The message, which is the result of my patient research, I formulate as follows:
On the cosmic scale, as on the terrestrial scale, blackness is an integral part of color and light processes.
My purpose is to inform you of this particular subject and the reasons that have led me to carry out my research, in the context of the problems of the very small country, whose history is as tortured as its geography, where I was born and grew up: Haiti, whose name means "land of mountains". This country has been faced for years with the difficulties inherent to any collectivity confronted with a problem of identity. In Canada, where I live and to which I have become acclimatized, this subject still motivates my research, propels my efforts and explains the audacity of my words. In the particular context of a centuries-old conflict, where personal interest and racial origins confront each other, it is essential that we get to the bottom of things. At this point, it would be as well to point out that branch of energy physics, namely optics, where scientific taboos concerning color, darkness and light are furthered and maintained by trade secrets, patents and vested interests. A rational search for original, and even avant-garde, answers on a scientific and intellectual level would seem to be a necessary prerequisite to establishing a balanced situation.
Not being a "scientist" - because "Sometimes, facts are so obvious that they hit you in the eye but, like ostriches, people bury their heads in the sand" - but rather, perhaps the most obscure of all obscure researchers of all obscure ages, I amasking a special favor from Professor Sagan. I would like him to agree to examine my modest results and the demonstration there of, backed up by photos and films. Needless to say, they may be freely used for any purposes deemed necessary to the success of my undertaking. On one film, I wanted to assemble in my own way the elements and conditions that I think are indispensable to the analysis and synthesis of colors. I amsubmitting four films called "color separations" and the color proofs to support this finding.
The sentences I quote below are yours. They are taken from an interview that you gave to a French magazine reporter:
... "after Apollo, scientists were discouraged. Do you know why they were disheartened? Because the sky above the Moon is black. That made them depressed. Do you think this is a joke? Not at all. Scientists are more fragile than they look. But the sky above Mars is rose-colored and that gave them hope."4
4 Delapré, Catherine "L'homme clef de Viking: Et maintenant il faut tout revoir...",
(Le Point, August 16, 1976, pp. 48,49) [our translation]
I can see you and Mrs. Sagan smiling, seeming to say, "Roses live the life span of a rose, the space of one morning."
The solution to the enigma of Space is not a "one-morning" task. Its darkness of an extraordinary depth, always so secretive and so intriguing, bordering on despair and insanity, fear and disgust, hatred and damnation, a consequence of ignorance or indifference, jealously hides incredible resources that would be of benefit to science, perceived only by such advanced, and wise, researchers as Professor Sagan.
With all due respect to the biblical Genesis, which from generation to generation teaches those who wish to hear it their way that "God divided the light from the darkness" (Gen. 1:4), and with all due respect to Sir Isaac Newton, who showed us all the colors of the rainbow with his prism, but who left us in the dark about the greatest unknown of all times, darkness itself, I insist that darkness -- "the black rose of space", arbitrarily denied as a positive value, always perceived negatively, discreet, hardly envious of the light which it absorbs, the better to conserve it -- has passed for the absence of light, while in reality it is the extension of light.
Since the beginning of time, a harmonious and complementary state has existed between light and darkness, whose equivalent effects are carefully balanced at the cosmic level, making us think, as sages of all ages have suggested, like Lavoisier, that in this coherent universe, "nothing is created, nothing is lost, everything is transformed".
The question we ask ourselves most often is this"What would our lives be without light?" All things being equal, and according to the Law of Conservation of Matter and Energy, we might ask, "What would life be without darkness?" Whether we say "darkness is an absence of light" or .light is an absence of darkness", is this not a simple question of semantics?
Reconciling light with darkness is a simple message that any future human or extraterrestrial space traveler should be able to grasp without too much difficulty. In the interests of any advanced civilization, obtaining a workable combination of visible and invisible forms of matter or energy is a chance to surpass ourselves by extending our own limits.
The so-called luminous part of the Universe, be it ever so brilliant, so forceful, that it seems to eclipse all the rest, while left in the shadow of its over whelming radiance, cannot by itself constitute a whole. The latter is left to the perception and investigation of scientists--but again, we must have the courage to get to the bottom of things.
The bottom of things is often veiled by mentalities. Mentalities depend on the human brain. It is interesting to note that the thing we are most proud of, this wonderful human brain -- physically, without our realizing it -- has always functioned in utter darkness. Man's skull constitutes, without a doubt, the best model of a dark room which has ever been conceived. On the optical as well as the psychological plane, one can easily imagine what roadblocks are likely to be encountered. When we wish to refer to the superior abilities of man, weuse the term "gray matter". Gray matter in a dark room, with or without a prism -- what a delicate situation! Isn't it where all the subtlety lies?
From the gray lunar soil of the Moon and in the concerted harmony of constructive forms, visible and invisible, of channeled light energy, the white rose and the black rose of the Cosmos and the possibility of roses in all color shades -- enough to make the sky of Mars blush red -- represent the true challenge of space and the spaceship in modern times. Inertia, spectral speed, speed equal to or higher than that of light, and the scientifically controlled reversibility of the phenomenon, what a new synthesis, but also what a liberation! To compare is not to prove, but the dark hidden side of the Moon, however mysterious it may be, is not a path of no return.
At the edge of light, there is darkness. At the edge of darkness, we can find light. Reconciling the "Children of Light" (I Thess. 5:5) -- of the zenith, the rising sun and the setting sun -- with the "Children of Darkness" (I Thess. 5:6) could perhaps one day become a question of scientific mentality.
"And there was evening and there was morning..." (Gen. 1:5).
Could this, Professor, be one of the most harmonious aspects of the vital cycle of space?
Thank you for your attention to my letter.
Yours very truly,
Lucien Bonnet
IN " BILL A RI AND THERW WAS LIGHT "
http://www.contact-canadahaiti.ca
What a fantastic review of a great movie Jerry! I too had a huge grin when I came out of the theater. It is such a great feeling to see this franchise doing so well once again!
In the game the rohan crone is very important, if you had enough rohan gold in the game, i think you will had a tall level, but if you do not had enough rohan online crone, i think now you already worried about how to play the game. so if you need the rohan online gold, you can come here and that in here you can buy cheapest the rohan money in the market.
dofus kama is the basic in the DOFUS fighting, the post-escalation is not necessarily the skill to play buy dofus kama can add one liter of its own hierarchy, that is really cheap kamas, and you can buy dofus kamas, followed by the use of Burning Arrow and attack on dofus gold.
If I were you I would like to share such superior stuff close to this good topic utilizing the article submission.
Do you want to get resume writer, that conform the range of science you desire?. You can count on our resume writers, as you count on yourself. Thanks because it’s the good stuff
When you want to get a good degree, you should accomplish the perfect english essay. The superb research papers referring to this post could be a correct issue for custom essay help doing, I opine.
I will like to thank you for a useful idea and as well, would like to share with you the free real ringtones in the professional ringtones Internet site.
Whether we adore it or not, previous in our lives, we would obligate to carry out term papers and other written assignment. It is doubtlessly not apparent but very amusing to make a research about this good post. To do that, you need to read a range of articles and books, or you can just order some kind of work and then use plagiarism checking finished by http://www.plagiarismsearch.com and save your time like some quick help with the American Dream.
Did you utilize an assistance of a custom classification essays service for your supreme outcome? I think that you really have unique argumentative essay performing ability. Thanks so much for this!
Post new comment